Skip to main content

making faces :: lusting after guerlain's gorgeous gardner

the look of love...
dear guerlain,

did something go awry with your logistics department? in the fall, you released this delicious deep berry lipstick called "gigolo", which might have been perfect for the season, but which also seems very holiday-appropriate. now i find out that you're releasing "gardner", a rich, warm red with a sumptuous, although subtle amber-gold shimmer drizzled through it like a touch of honey and i can't help thinking that it seems less in keeping with traditional ideas of holiday reds than your fall choice. was a mistake made? or are you simply playfully challenging the notions of seasonal shades? not that i care, because i love your rouge g lipsticks and as long as i think i can get away with the colour, i'm going to buy them and where them in whatever season i damn well please [because at that price, i'm getting my money's worth].
i have to say that "gardner" is a real winner. it has the creamy texture i've come to expect, the even coverage, the uniqueness that makes me fork over hard-earned money and optimum points to get them. although i didn't find this shade lasted quite as long on my lips as "gigolo", i'm not going to fault you for that, because that one was sort of exceptional. it stood up very well for several hours and, although the satiny sheen of first application faded [as it must], the colour retained its distinctive characteristics rather than becoming an ordinary orange-red stain.

about the shade's distinctiveness, i have to admit that it not only excites me as i try to come up with words to describe a shade i truly didn't have in my collection but thinking about it makes me hungry. i believe that's because the shade puts me in mind of autmnal foods- deep, vibrant roasted red peppers, smoky paprika, sundried tomatoes- i'm reminded of these far more than i am of other lipstick shades. i truly don't know how you do it, meaning come up with things that are just so difficult to match. and it's not that i don't have a lot of things to try matching it to. i thought that maybe your own shade "gipsy" was similar, but it's lighter and it's much more of a pumpkin orange with gold shimmer. lovely, but not at all the same. everything else seemed either much too brown [and there's really very little brown in "gardner" at all] or much too red.

MORE OF THIS LOVE LETTER AND MORE PICS AFTER THE BREAK



when i saw that both you and nars opted for a holiday palette featuring blues for the eyes and amber-tones for the lips, i was afraid they'd end up looking exactly the same, but that's not at all the case. while i might have given the edge to nars on the eyes, their holiday lipstick "joyous red" is much lighter and, ironically, less red than "gardner".

it's a little surprising to me just how much i love this shade, because i tend to favour cooler reds, but occasionally i just meet a warmed-up shade like this and i realise that life is too short to impose arbitrary limits on one's colour palette. 

although my bank account would like to beg you to stop with the wonderful colours, i know that i will never tire of seeing them or wearing them and every time i whip out one of your elborate rouge g cases, my lips and i feel sinfully spoiled. i am certain you will continue to confound and amaze me with each passing season, even if you introduce a black rouge g with your spring 2012 collection.

yours with love and beautifully coloured kisses,
kate

p.s. a few of my friends have suggested that i'd make a great lip model for guerlain. i'm game if you are.

p.p.s. i've heard that gardner is only available in europe, but we have it here in canada. i do notice that it's not available on sephora or neiman marcus or nordstrom and, most shocking, there's no mention of it on your web site. if it's true that this colour is only available in limited countries [you know, chanel usually lumps canada in with europe too, which is odd, but i'll take it] that's quite naughty of you, guerlain! because now i have to tell my american readers that if they want this, they'll have to find someone in europe or canada willing to get it for them. [excuse me while i cackle sadistically at the thought of all the things that the u.s. gets that i never even see.]

p.p.p.s. below are a few photos of a look i did for my first date with "gardner". we went for a walk. it was lovely.

"gardner"

the lips are naturally going to be the focus with a rich colour like that, but since it's not an overly dark colour, i was trying to use slightly warmer tones. strangely, i find that the camera didn't pick up the green around my eyes at all, although i assure, it was there. i do think that these photos are a really accurate representation of what "gardner" looks like. so, yes, this is what you're in for.

products used

face ::
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"

eyes ::
mac e/s "motif" [peachy gold with pink iridescence]
mac e/s "dazzlelight" [light neutral highlighter]
nars e/s "night porter" [blackened pine green]
chanel e/s "khaki vert" [frosted olive green with gold]
mac greasepaint stick "greengrease"* [greenish black]
mac superslick liquid liner "desires & devides" [dirty khaki green]
benefit they're real mascara

cheeks ::
mac highlight powder "marine life"* [pink-coral]

lips ::
guerlain rouge g l/s "gardner" [deep, warm red]

*suggested alternates :: greengrease = makeup forever aqua eyes pencil "20l"; marine life = nars deep throat

Comments

I LOVE it sooo much!!! PS..You have such flawless skin!
flora_mundi said…
This shade would be just devastating on you, for certain.

And thanks for the skin compliment. It's honestly dumb luck, because I've only started taking care of it properly in the last few years.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

the world at war?

in my semi-smug but genuinely curious way, i posted a question on my facebook page earlier: how much of the world has to be at war before it counts as world war iii?



the first response i got raised the very legitimate point that this is the sort of question that gets answered by historians, once the haze of the present has faded. the other important factor is that people don't just declare war on each other the way that they used to. major powers entered both the of the world wars with the blessings of their own parliaments, whereas conflicts since world war ii have happened in coded language, sometimes circumventing the political process in the interests of expediency. president reagan never declared war on the nicaraguan government in the eighties, for example, but the united states was clearly in a state of armed conflict, even if most of the arms were being carried by their proxies, the contras.

whether or not we are living in a world at war is a tricky question. despite what…

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

mental health mondays :: pop quiz

those of you who are friends of mine on facebook [that might look a little weird to those of you seeing this post on facebook] may have seen my weekly "sunday quiz time", where i just ask random questions in the name of stimulating conversation. after doing that this week, i ended up taking a very wide variety of quizzes on mental floss, which made me a little smug about my knowledge of geography and a little rattled about my knowledge of the finer points of grammar. [i want to say, in my defense, that the one grammar quiz i found was really f**king hard. is that last sentence grammatically correct? i don't know. i have no confidence in my grammar anymore.]

i got so into answering questions about just about anything that i thought it might be fun to apply that format to mental health mondays. i've already done links to quizzes about various mental disorders and how to tell if you have them [i think it turned out i had all of them], but i wanted to do a special set of…