Skip to main content

making faces :: a spring fling recap

well now that i've prosthelytized to all of you about favourites for the spring season, i thought it was only fair to show you that i do put my proverbial money where my mouth is- and where the rest of my face is as well. after all, the photos i've shown might have clearly illustrated that i was wearing the shades i recommended on my nails, but i thought that it would be nice to share a couple of other looks in the spirit of the new season.

of course, no one's saying that you have to spend the next three months wearing neutral pink lips, shell-toned cheeks and green eye shadow, in fact, it would probably be boring if you did. [even my friend kathleen, who is a green freak in every sense of the word, except the one that would mean she were an actual green monster, which she isn't, doesn't wear green all the time.] but i do find that these are a nice option for the time of year and still give a certain level of variety.

this first one was obviously done a while back, because you can see i still had my black hair. i like the fact that it's a cooler-toned green look, which is a little less common. i like combining "periwinkle cardinal" with the bluish-silver shade from hourglass "prism", because of the chilly "foggy" effect it gives. since both shades are quite shimmery, a little goes a long way to create a day or night kind of look.

face ::
marcelle new age foundation "ivory"
smashbox high definition liquid concealer "fair/ light"

eyes ::
rouge bunny rouge e/s "perwinkle cardinal" [shimmery cool green with silver]
hourglass e/s "prism" [frosty slate blue- silver]
mac e/s "vex" [greenish ivory with pink sheen]
mac shadestick "cakeshop"* [light frosty green-pewter]
mac e/s "stovepipe black"* [gunmetal grey with sheen]
guerlain eye kohl "black"
chanel inimitable intense mascara

cheeks ::
edward bess quad royale "south of france" [mauve-sand]
mac blush "amazon princess"* [deep rose]

lips ::
mac l/s "viva glam v" [light pink with gold pearl]

*suggested alternates :: cakeshop = nars dogon [light side, not as bright or frosty]; stovepipe black = nars eurydice [grey side]; amazon princess = mac love thing + dollymix

SEE LOOK #2 AFTER THE BREAK...



one thing i love trying, as i've mentioned before, is a smoky eye in different colours. i find it's a look that's can be more or less dramatic depending on the situation and the intensity of the colours used and greens do seem to lend themselves particularly well to the task. [oddly, a green smoky eye is about the only shade i didn't do in my original smoky eye post.]

there are a number of techniques people use in doing this sort of look. i'm not sure which one is orthodox vs. progressive vs. ultra-orthodox and i don't want to spit on anyone's cosmetic religion, but i tend to alternate between them. what i've done here is what i consider the easiest- a gradient of colour with the darkest shades used close to the lash lines and gradually lightening from there. [obviously, i only used a couple of colours on the lower lids, since doing the full gradient would have left me with green down to my cheek bones.] the key to this look is a nice blending brush. a wonderful friend sent me one from tom ford that is my magic wand. i pat product on like an expressionist painter until there are splotches of colour everywhere i need. then i wave my magic wand over the area and *poof* everything looks smooth and seamless.

and hey, i finally figured i'd include close-up shots of my eyes. i've been a little hesitant to do this mostly because, up close, my application techniques do sometimes show their amateur quality, but if they help, let me know and i'll continue to include them in these posts.

face ::
same as above

eyes ::
nars e/s "night porter" [blackened green]
nars e/s "blade runner" [rich forest green]
mac e/s "lucky green" [shimmery yellow green]
mac e/s "creamy bisque"* [off-white highlighter]

cheeks ::
mac mineralize blush "dainty" [yellow pink]

lips ::
nars l/s "pago pago" [whisper-pink with white and gold shimmer]

*suggested alternate :: creamy bisque = mac vanilla [more matte] or dazzlelight [whiter and more shimmer]

and in case you'd like to go back and look through my various spring recommendations, here you go:

part 1 :: nails
part 2 :: eyes
part 3 :: lips
part 4 :: cheeks

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …