Skip to main content

making faces :: girl time

i figured that i might as well make myself look presentable, despite the fact that i continue to suffer from the after effects of the plague of boils on my face. however, i've noticed that lately, my littlest fur-baby, while she's quite a little tomboy in many respects, is now at least as excited as i am about the prospect of me putting on makeup.

because whenever it's time, she jumps up on the dresser to, er, help. she gets so worked up by the prospect of getting to play with mom's awesome toys that i've had to learn how to acquire makeup one-handed, while using the other to keep her out of the brushes and little pots. i think i can forever write off the possibility of buying guerlain meteorites.

of course, as soon as she sees my arm, she starts the second phase of the game, which is climbing on me, butting her head into my head, shoulder and hand and purring loudly. which means that i'm developing some pretty awesome skills with liquid eyeliner. also, i suspect i'll be embracing the "messy smoky eye" look a lot.

this sort of thing is a legitimate danger for any cosmetic-wearing cat owner, but lulu actually enjoys all the parts of the beauty blogging experience, including being involved in the photo-taking afterward. behold:




and here are a couple of less interesting photos, although you can see in the first one that seth made a photobomb appearance behind my left shoulder [your right]. 



when preparing, lulu definitely has her preferred makeup tools toys. specifically:

the mac 217 brush, which is fluffier than my tom ford blending brush and therefore more fun to watch.

my quo bronzing/ power brush [kinda like a bigger version of the mac 187]. she much prefers this for blending to my urban decay optical blending brush, which is dense, but thick and not prone to spreading its feathers all over the place.

shadows by rouge bunny rouge and le metier de beaute. she likes any single shadows that come with a mirror, since they are small and create light reflections that are fun to play with. it's like two toys in one! strangely, though, she seems to prefer these to square shadows like nars or chanel. palettes are less interesting, although she does occasionally like pushing them closed when my fingers are in them.

giorgio armani eyes to kill shadows. packed in powder + inherent sparkles + little stopper that gets removed... almost too much fun for one kitty.

blushes are less fun, but chasing blush/ powder brushes during application is awesome.

trying to catch a lipstick bullet as it comes out of its shell is somewhat amusing. also, any lipstick can be pushed into a human nostril by butting your head against it while it's being applied.

so here's an entirely lulu-approved face, done with her assistance:

the base ::

gosh velvet touch primer
mac paint pot "painterly"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla" [review coming soon!]
guerlain parure de lumiere "beige clair 01"

the eyes ::

edward bess quad royale "south of france" [2 lightest shades- light pink sand]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "bashful flamingo" [light pink-peach]
mac e/s "neutral pink" [deep fleshy pink]*
le metier de beaute e/s "corinthian" [shimmery pink taupe]
armani eyes to kill e/s "lust red" [blackened red with purple shimmer]
mac superslick liquid liner "on the hunt" [black patent]
givenchy noir couture mascara "brown satin"

the cheeks ::

chanel joues ombre "notorious" [lilac-taupe]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "mood light" [warm mauve-pink- review coming on this one too!]
guerlain highlight powder "parure de nuit" [ultra-light coral pink with white sheen]*

the lips ::

tom ford l/s "black orchid" [vampy dark red-plum]

*suggested alternates :: neutral pink = mac girlie [cooler and has more of a satiny sheen]; parure de nuit = i haven't really found a match, which is why i hunted this one down on ebay, but combining mac lightscapade with a wee bit of nars sex appeal might give you a similar effect.

important note :: always remember when doing tag-team makeup application with a cat to leave adequate time for clean-up afterward. this is not an activity for everyone. always clean cat scratches thoroughly and stop the bleeding before you apply concealer.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …