Skip to main content

making faces :: madame refuses to wait

something tasty's here...
so despite the fact that i had a three day weekend in which i really didn't accomplish a whole heck of a
lot else, i was remiss in getting swatches of some of the new things that i've added to my collection. and one of them just didn't want to wait for me to have time this weekend or take chances that the light might be less than perfect for her.

honestly, though, i don't think "madame batifole" would need to worry. one of three new and limited rouge g's from guerlain's fall collection, i believe she'd be stunning in any light.

first of all, madame has pigment. all rouge g's are pigmented, of course, but not all have quite this much. the only other i've met that is her match is "gigolo", from guerlain's 2011 fall collection. the two shades do remind me of one another in a way i can't quite put into words [which won't stop you from trying -ed.]. both are berry shades with a lot of red in them. "gigolo" is deeper and purpler. "madame batifole" is brighter and pinker. both have a hint of pinky-red shimmer that doesn't read as frost but does somehow affect how the colour is perceived. perhaps they're day and night versions of each other? or light and dark? "madame batifole" translates roughly as "the lady frolics", whereas gigolo... well, you see where there might be a thematic link.

direct light
indirect light
of course, the two shades don't look especially similar for the reasons i've outlined above. nor does the lady really resemble mac "rebel" [seen here], although both fall into the same category of shade- bright berry tones. the madame is more pink/ red, noticeably warmer. my recently acquired urban decay "jilted"has a somewhat similar base, but they part ways from there. "jilted" has an icy sheen that pulls the colour decidedly cool, whereas la madame runs warm.



because of her impeccable balance of warm and cool and the multiplicity of shades she carries within her, "madame batifole" is a perfect guest for any party, or any face. the question is not whether she will be a match for you, the question is whether or not you will be able to match her. after all, she is bold and strong and powerful. she wants to be noticed and will make this happen. if you're up to that challenge, then she will be the best partner you could wish for- and one who will stay with you in all her glory for as long as you want her. [note:: she means "long-wearing". i never know what to do when she goes all rapturous like this. -ed.]

ahem. i've already said virtually everything i can say about the rouge g formula. like gigolo, this is an exceptional variation on an already exceptional product. at their best, there is almost nothing that can compete with them. [the "almost" is in recognition of the fact that there is a constant tug-of-war in my heart between rouge g's and rouge d'armanis.]

i love shades like "madame batifole" because they are so simple to wear and require so little in the way of adornment. here's what i mean.




the base ::
gosh velvet touch primer
armani luminous silk foundation "3"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
guerlain e/s palette "les bois roses" [shimmery pink-white, pink granite, warm grey, dark mahogany brown]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "gracious arasari" [deep satin beige]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "desperation" [dark coffee brown]
ysl baby doll mascara

the cheeks ::
nars blush "nico" [satin cream beige]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "dim light" [warm shimmery beige]

lips ::
guerlain rouge g l/s "madame batifole" [intense red magenta]

the verdict? this lady could not be more beautiful if she tried. i'd recommend her wholeheartedly. if you've been colour-analysed as a "bright" season [which i suspect i am], either winter or spring, this is absolutely a must-have. [i'm caught between those seasons when categorizing the look above.] my guess is that anyone across the winter spectrum, a true spring, a true summer or even a dark autumn would also carry this beautifully.

available now wherever guerlain is sold. for canadians, that includes shoppers drug mart, who have apparently reversed their decision only to carry permanent items from the brand.

the lovely photo at the top of this post was snatched from this page, a forum where you can find many exciting photos and discussions of reptiles.

Comments

Bellyhead said…
This looks incredible on you! Bright, clear and so flattering. Madame Batifole does right by your face. :)
Lucinda Veen said…
This reminds me of one of my favorite drugstore lipsticks (and one of my favorite lipsticks in general), Maybelline Vivid Rose. It doesn't have any shimmer, but it's that amazing red-toned fuchsia color.
Kate MacDonald said…
Why thank you! She does make me happy, as do most bright shades.
Kate MacDonald said…
Lucinda- I can see what you mean. There is something about fuchsia shades when they have red in them that's quite exceptional. You expect them to be very cool-toned, but they aren't... Just magical, I think.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

the world at war?

in my semi-smug but genuinely curious way, i posted a question on my facebook page earlier: how much of the world has to be at war before it counts as world war iii?



the first response i got raised the very legitimate point that this is the sort of question that gets answered by historians, once the haze of the present has faded. the other important factor is that people don't just declare war on each other the way that they used to. major powers entered both the of the world wars with the blessings of their own parliaments, whereas conflicts since world war ii have happened in coded language, sometimes circumventing the political process in the interests of expediency. president reagan never declared war on the nicaraguan government in the eighties, for example, but the united states was clearly in a state of armed conflict, even if most of the arms were being carried by their proxies, the contras.

whether or not we are living in a world at war is a tricky question. despite what…

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

mental health mondays :: pop quiz

those of you who are friends of mine on facebook [that might look a little weird to those of you seeing this post on facebook] may have seen my weekly "sunday quiz time", where i just ask random questions in the name of stimulating conversation. after doing that this week, i ended up taking a very wide variety of quizzes on mental floss, which made me a little smug about my knowledge of geography and a little rattled about my knowledge of the finer points of grammar. [i want to say, in my defense, that the one grammar quiz i found was really f**king hard. is that last sentence grammatically correct? i don't know. i have no confidence in my grammar anymore.]

i got so into answering questions about just about anything that i thought it might be fun to apply that format to mental health mondays. i've already done links to quizzes about various mental disorders and how to tell if you have them [i think it turned out i had all of them], but i wanted to do a special set of…