Skip to main content

making faces :: another fuchsia followed me home

a couple of months back, i reviewed three of the four lipsticks released with the armani "fuchsia maharajah" collection and mentioned that i hadn't seen the fourth at either of my local counters. but my habit of haunting counters until i get what i want served me well and, eventually, one of them did get a few units. another fuchsia-pink rouge ecstasy? you'd better believe that's coming home with me.

the fourth and final lipstick in this collection is called either "pink blush" or "pink bliss". all of the promotional material i saw used the former name, but the packaging of the lipstick uses the latter. it's probably easier to go with calling it "511", which isn't quite as exciting, but is at least consistent from one place to another. as mentioned, it's one of the rouge ecstasy formula lipsticks, which are supposed to be long-wearing and offer skin care benefits to the lips. the colour coverage is said to be full, which it is, although it's never 100% opaque. the fullest coverage in the armani line belongs to the original rouge d'armani lipsticks. [as a side note, i can't help but notice that the colour offering of the rouge d'armani line has been dwindling both at counters and on line. i suspect that something is afoot and i hope that the rda line is being revamped and not just discontinued. there is still absolutely a place for a very full-coverage formula within the brand offering.] as far as the skin care benefits, i don't have a monogamous relationship with any lipstick formula, but this is the only lipstick that i can wear in the depths of winter. so how much of an improvement you get might be a little difficult to discern, but there is something to the claim that they are kind to your kisser.

"pink blush" is a brighter shade than that name would lead you to believe. it's a bold, clear pink that leans cool, right on the border between pink and fuchsia. compared to rouge ecstasy 512, "maharajah", it is a bit muted, a little lighter and definitely less red. it's a little more daytime friendly, although it's still the sort of shade that is going to make a statement.

511 pink blush, or pink bliss... your choice

i found that the formula on this one was just a little below what i've come to expect from the rouge ecstasy line. it was a little difficult to get the colour even [although not to the degree i experienced with "urban nude"] and the wear time was noticeably shorter. neither problem is huge, but it's perplexing. i can't figure out why this one should be even a little less incredible than the others.

for comparisons, the closest shade i have to "pink blush" is a limited mac shade from 2010 called "pink burst". although it's somewhat difficult to see in the photos, "pink burst" is a frost shade, with a lot of silver and white shimmer that makes it look both lighter and cooler, whereas "pink blush" has no shimmer. that means that, while the base colours are indeed similar, they look quite different in use. mac "catharina" is deeper, more saturated and redder.

l to r :: mac pink burst [l.e.], 511, mac catharina

and also for comparison's sake, here's a look at all the shades of lipstick from the "fuchsia maharajah" collection.

l to r :: 511 pink blush, 512 maharajah, 604 garconne fatale, rouge d'armani 513 maharajah

finally, of course, it wouldn't be a "me" post if i didn't share a look that incorporated the product i'm reviewing. so here's a look at "pink blush" along with some of her friends.




products used

the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "mont blanc"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
armani eyes to kill e/s "gold hercule" [muted gold with a grey-green cast]*
le metier de beauté e/s "jade" [rich emerald green]
mac e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery neutral highlight]
illamasqua precision gel e/l [matte black]
dior new look mascara

the cheeks ::
hourglass ambient blush "incandescent electra" [cool peach]

the lips ::

armani rouge ecstasy l/s "pink blush 511" [bright cool pink]

*suggested alternate :: gold hercule = armani eye tint #6 "green iron" [darker] or mac gorgeous gold [brighter, yellower]

all of the fuchsia maharajah collection is limited, but a lot of counters and online retailers still have stock [even if they don't have testers out, it's worth asking]. even though it's not quite the best example of the rouge ecstasy formula, "pink blush" is still a solid choice if you're looking for a cheery summer shade that's bright but not loud.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …